So what is Milne's point within this metaphor? Well, it's the idea that white isn't another colour - it is the norm. Everything is white until we decide that it isn't. Until we decide that it is other.
What are the dangers of this?
Google offers up two main definitions for white:
- Of the colour of milk or fresh snow, due to the reflection of all visible rays of light; the opposite of black
- "A sheet of white paper"
- belonging to or denoting a human group having light-coloured skin (chiefly used of peoples of European extraction).
- "A white farming community"
- Synonyms: Caucasian, European, non-black
- "The early white settlers of Australia"
"The colour of milk or fresh snow"
Sounds pretty nice! But what about brown? Or black? What jumps to mind for those colours?
Brown: "of a colour produced by mixing red, yellow, and blue, as of dark wood or rich soil: 'an old brown coat.'"
(Brown isn't even its own colour now?)
Black: "of the very darkest colour owing to the absence of or complete absorption of light; the opposite of white...'black smoke'...synonyms: dark, pitch-black, as black as pitch, pitch-dark, jet-black, inky, etc."
Not as nice, huh? We as a society, over hundreds of years, have reduced each other to colours. Not only do we simplify thousands of years of migration and cultural significance to colours, we fail to recognize that white is a colour as well. Society views "white" as the norm, or as Milne describes it, "the background." We are taught, from a young age, to point out "the other," the "non-white" as set apart from the normal. This is a dangerous ideology and hinders social progress, because until we, as a majority in the society, as white people, include ourselves in this "colouring" and destroy the belief that other colours only show up against our background, we can never truly move forward to a world where all races are equal; a world without the existence of racism.
Works Cited:
Milne,
B A. 2013. Colouring in the White Spaces:
Reclaiming Cultural Identity in Whitestream Schools. University of Waikato.
I absolutely love the analogy you have cited of white as 'the background' because it sums up the current ideology of whiteness so completely. I mean, if you were to describe Naomi Campbell to someone who didn't know her I'd bet money that everyone would say something along the lines of "You know, she's that black model". People might use many words to describe Kate Moss, but I highly doubt 'white' would be among them. In fact, we all know that it won't because this is the norm. Have we ever heard anybody in Western society routinely described as 'white?' Of course not, because it is the norm against which everything, including other colours, have always been measured. Not to mention that the colour white traditionally represents innocence and purity whilst anything dark is seen as evil or dangerous (Shakespeare's 'Othello' is a major contributor here). Until this is actually acknowledged, it cannot be rectified. Yet if it is we would see an enormous growth in positive race relations.
ReplyDelete