“Bend It Like Beckham”
(director. Gurinder Chadha) is a film about a young Indian girl in Britain. She
enjoys playing football but as she is from a religious orthodox Sikh family she
has to hide it from her parents and rebel against the traditions her parents
want to set upon her, such as finding a good boyfriend and learning to cook.
This film has a lot of examples of racism both overt and inferential
between both cultures of Indian and British. The racism is shown not just by
the way things are portrayed but by how the audience reads the different scenes
and elements in the text. This will differ depending on the background of each
individual.
An example of overt racism is when Mr Bharma said, “You know how hard it is for our children
here. Sometimes they misjudge and start behaving like the kids here.” - This is
very overt as it shows the perspective of all Indian immigrant families
especially the Bharma family in this film towards British teenagers. This film
lets you have an insight on Indian immigrant families and how they interact and
how they think of people from different ethnicities and cultural backgrounds.
Soccer Team Girl: So, you can choose, does that mean you can marry a
white boy?
Jess: - White, no, black, definitely not, a Muslim, no way! – This
again is overt racism showing how Indian families want you to only marry
Indians they don’t believe any other culture is suitable. Especially Muslim’s
as they have quite a bit of conflict each other and differences between each religion due to
historical conflicts that took place.
This is film has a lot of racism which can be inferential but also can be overt to some audiences’.
This text helps contrast between British and Indians and has many norms of both cultures
but due to an Indian director there are ideas that can’t be picked up by european audience and is specific to the culture. Jules mum taking her to a bra store is something that is
looked down upon in Indian traditions. It is portrayed to mostly only Indian
audience that her mother is trying to sexualize her which is not something that
a mother should do to their daughter in Indian culture. In Indian culture females are meant to be
judged by their intellect and ability of doing household jobs not sex appeal.
To Indian audience this example would have made them view Jules’ mum as a bad
parent and an antagonist in someway.
Mrs Paxton makes a lot of racist comments such as - ‘Oh, I made a lovely
curry yesterday’ and comments about Jess’ mum partnering her with a nice
handsome doctor this shows the racism towards Indians from British as well and
how they mostly relate Indians to curry, arranged marriages and doctors (smart).
Throughout the film we can see inferential racism due to the stereotyping of Indian families. The accent to the way they dress and their values. The Bharma family is looked upon as a generalization of an Indian family, though some stereotyping may be right it cannot be generalized to every Indian family. Jess responds to her friend tony claiming that he’s gay by saying “..but you are Indian”, This develops the generalization that all Indians don’t like homosexuals or in that fact believe in homosexuality. Which is addressed again by a grandmother saying “Lesbian? Her birthday is in March. I thought she was a Pisces”.
The film carries a lot of overt and inferential racism which can vary between audience and individual backgrounds they bring whilst interpreting any film not just this one.
Pictures-
http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=259648&page=2
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0286499/
http://rebloggy.com/post/subtitles-stills-bend-it-like-beckham-non-bolly/3142880736
http://weheartit.com/entry/group/19911439
Yes! I agree with this all! When I was younger I never paid attention to these things, surely I felt angry at some of the stereotypes but that was it. But now, just like your post, I can now see the deeper meaning behind some of the racisms. Good post - very easy and interesting to read!
ReplyDeleteAs well as this it is also a form of casual racism and stereotypes. Again, as a young child I was quite happy with this film as I saw it as a way of representation for Indians. But, now all I see is a whole lot of stereotypes and white saviour pushed into one film.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhen I was younger I loved this film and of course was not aware of the racism and stereotypes presented to the audience as I am now. Looking back on the movie, I agree that Jess' community is represented with cultural stereotypes, and liked how you explained how perceptions may vary due to understanding of racism and culture, and how certain aspects may not sit right with every audience. This got me thinking about how these stereotypes could be used or possibly exploited for the comedic effect of the film. The differences in British and Indian cultures is what the film builds off of - much like is the case in movies like the 'Rush Hour' as discussed in lectures, and in 'The Hangover'. This film makes sure to poke fun at the two integrated cultures though, by turning it around on the English at times.
ReplyDeleteI watched this film so many times growing up, and for the most part, the racial stereotyping went right over my head. But looking at it now I can definitely see how the film plays on that racial stereotyping for comedic effect.
ReplyDeleteWow, totally did not realise all the stereotypes and subtle racism that's in this movie. Loved this analysis of the movie, as I was reading through it, it definitely opened my eyes to things I would not have noticed when I was younger. Also, good post in terms of balancing out your opinions and materials from the lectures.
ReplyDeleteThis is definitely the type of film in which racism is 'invisible' unless you look hard for it. I think the comedic spin on many racial stereotypes throughout the film, such as the conservative Mother and Aunties and how they react negatively to anything which is not traditional, is effective because as we are busy laughing, we do not question the reduction. As you have said, a lot of the racist remarks and features of the film are inferential, and we see them as 'naturalised' because they are dominant in mainstream media.
ReplyDelete