“To hell with the burqa. It has no place here”
said Paul Holmes in an article which directly followed two separate incidents
in Auckland in 2011. Two Auckland bus drivers were given counselling and
received warnings after they refused to let two Muslim women wearing hijab’s
onto their buses – one of whom was asked by the bus driver to remove her veil
altogether. While both of the bus drivers claimed it had nothing to do with
religion, they attributed their actions to a phobia of people wearing masks
“maskophobia”. In respects while this phobia may have played a role in both of
the women’s refusal to board the buses, beyond the surface, aspects like Eurocentrism
and Orientalism are at play in this situation.
As we have learned, Eurocentrism expresses the
ideology that the West is at the centre, as producers of knowledge where
Western values are normal and Eastern values are inferior. Through Eurocentrism
in this certain situation, seeing the hijab automatically means foreign,
different, and something that is not associated with being Western,
involuntarily making the hijab and the wearer inferior to Western cultural
practices. In ‘Unthinking Eurocentrism’ Shohat and Stam elaborate that
Eurocentrism uses language to create binaries, flattering the West - the use of
the hijab/buraqa may be described as their “folklore” where Western cultural practices are simply
“culture”.
While Orientialism is how the West perceived
the East to be like – this perception is full of stereotypes which have been
produced and reinforced over hundreds of years to the extent where they have
become ‘common sense’ and so naturalized that these stereotypes often go
largely unquestioned, we can attribute this to the long running and on-going
portrayal of Muslims in the media. Muslims are frequently portrayed as violent
(ABC’s Lost), oppressed (CSI) and violent (Raiders of the Lost Ark).
The discourse of the ‘West and the Rest’ is
also a factor, as Stuart Hall has explained, all non-Western countries are lumped
together becoming inferior to Western countries. In a lot of situations we see this
as Muslims are continually stereotyped as terrorists and many group them
together as so, based on as previously mentioned what is seen in the media and
the actions of only a few.
Following both bus incidents, the New Zealand
Herald released an article posing the question as to whether should be allowed
in New Zealand? For the majority, there was without a doubt the burqa/hijab did
not belong in New Zealand as it was seen ‘scary’, a way of oppressing the
wearer and was simply not a part of our culture. Paul Holmes extended on these
points in his article I have mentioned above, where he claimed the hijab makes
a statement implying “I am not part of your filthy heathen community… but I
don’t really approve of you all and have no desire to be a part of you”, I
think it’s farfetched to believe just because someone embraces wearing a
burqa/hijab in a nation that is not dominantly Muslim they do not want to be
part of a community. To hold onto and maintain ones own cultural values and
beliefs ie. wearing a hijab/burqa enhances cultural hybridity and resists
Eurocentricism as Suzanne mentioned in Lecture 3.
As our country becomes an increasingly multi-cultural
nation it is important that we learn to tackle situations we may not be
comfortable with, accepting other peoples beliefs and cultural practices is
important if we ourselves want to be accepted in these ways.
The idea that Muslim also relates to terrorism has made it acceptable for these types of Islamophobia to occur. BY associating these extremist with a religion they are able to justify their actions. I remember a New Zealand army recruitment advert (https://youtu.be/ZvkMZCaMGiU) Where you have to decide whether or not to open the door. These thoughts have been embedded in our mind by media for many years that it is hard not to think in such a guarded way. This type of inferential Racism helps us to reject 'different' religions and cultures by creating negative stereotypes for us to associate them with.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog, and it made me think!
ReplyDeleteThe Burqa is worn for religious reasons, just like a person wearing a ski mask in a bank for other reasons. It is hard to define whether it was right or wrong? When the incidents involving the Muslim women were refused to board public transport.
As you mentioned, we are a multi cultural society which i totally agree :)
But would it be fair to say we would have to be in a similar situation to understand why they were refused.
Don't get me wrong, but i am thinking there would be variables the bus driver would have to take into account when making a decision.
The most important one being the safety of all the other passengers, and maybe even the Muslim women from potential verbal or physical abuse from the passengers.
Sorry Tali I haven't had a look back at my old posts and I've just realised your comment is here :)
DeleteAnyway, yeah what you said at the end made me have a long hard think about what I would have done in that situation. I guess the potential reasons as to why or why not the ladies weren't on the bus (Islamophobia and awful stereotypes) are the real issue behind this ordeal