https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpvutGPY7zU
Performed by Marvin Hodges, Em Allison
& Saidu Tejan-Thomas, this list-like poem draws attention to many levels of
racism in modern America. This poem is directed to the black community and
highlights the imperfections of white behaviour.
It addresses institutional/structural
racism with the lines ‘Don’t have objects like squares or rectangles in your
pockets… Do not fit the description’. This highlights the racial stereotyping
by police we are unfortunately familiar with in the US by referencing past
attacks such as police shootings on innocent black victims which were pardoned
with excuses of ‘sudden movements’ or ‘they were reaching for a gun’.
The poem also remarks on micro-level racism
by addressing the novelty value white people place on natural black hair. ‘Let
them touch it when they ask, it relaxes…’ This action stigmatises black people,
assumedly unconsciously, by reinforcing the idea of difference in and
unacceptance of race. If unconsciously done, it follows Spoonley’s idea that ‘racist
beliefs and racist behaviour do not necessarily accompany each other’. A curiosity
is explored through (sometimes/usually) inappropriate actions. The poem
continues, ‘You wear your hair straight so why can’t they wear braids, dreads,
afros?’ Highlighting the so-called ‘reverse racism’ thought present in society.
Of course this concept is ridiculous. This example is specifically more
involved with cultural appropriation, but in the wider sense as Spoonley also
points out, racism is ‘prejudice plus power’. As black people hold no institutional/personal
power over white people by protecting against this appropriation, the racism
isn’t present.
‘Reverse racism’ is also dealt with
directly. ‘Do not make things exclusively for the betterment of your race, that’s reverse racism’. This reminded
me of the comic in week 4’s lecture which highlights the ‘independence’ of white
societies gaining power and control and how delusional it is.
Da Rules mentions ‘new’ racism, which I feel
is specifically important, by the line, ‘Do not tell white friends you’re on scholarship.’
This suggests that if black people do, they will be resented either because; they
need scholarships as they are from a lower socio-economic background and therefore
undeserving of higher education or; because black students don’t deserve ‘hand
outs’ because of their race that the dominant white people are not entitled to.
The black community cannot win either way.
However, not all the racism in this poem is
the fault of the white society. There is arguably a bit of Spivack’s strategic
essentialism in the form of self-hatred by the lines, ‘Do not date outside your
race. Your own people will consider you a sell out anyway. What? You’re not
strong enough to handle a black
woman?’ What I gather from this is that there is an opinion in the black
community that dating outside the community is rejecting black identity for an
easier, white-washed lifestyle. This could understandably be frowned upon. This
attitude also polarizes black and white peoples, but whether that is a good
thing or not, and in what ways and to what degree is hard to determine.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.