Nina Simone has always been a musical idol
of mine. I always felt a deep connection to her powerful voice, and admired her
ability to convey emotions, messages and elicit emotional responses in me,
despite being from such a different time. It was not until I stumbled across
the documentary on Youtube last week, ‘What Happened, Miss Simone?” until I
realized how revolutionary she really was, and how she used her voice to put a
spell on many other individuals.
Nina Simone (1933-2003) was an American
singer, a black activist, a mother and a revolutionary. She was raised in a
time where societal restraints, such as oppression, segregation and isolation
were overtly imposed on her because of the colour of her skin. Transgressing
many cross-sectional boundaries, and challenging historical norms and
traditions, Nina’s goal was to become the “first black classical pianist in
America.” She had a way of eliciting emotional responses in her audiences, and
used the power of her voice to address racial inequalities, issues of freedom
and question identity within a rigid, hegemonic social order. As Nina’s stature
as a popular artist within mainstream society grew, she integrated views
regarding black civil rights into her songs. Due to political, socio-economic
and contextual circumstances Nina’s performances by dominant, mainstream,
Western corporations and audiences often weren’t warmly regarding, which, along
with other contributing factors, lead Nina to a state of despair and
psychological trauma. I want to argue, that despite Nina’s downward spiral in
later life, she made a dent in confronting racial prejudices and injustices,
and helped circulate alternative social ideas despite being bound down by a
rigid, capitalist regime.
The documentary touches on the injustices,
inequities and oppression, Nina faced throughout her life. Some defining
moments in her childhood help the audience understand the pain, loneliness and
sense of isolation that seem to have been recurring themes throughout Nina’s
life. Raised in North Carolina, Nina was picked out from a revival church piano
recital by two white women who decided to give her piano lessons. She had to
cross the train tracks every morning to have lessons. The train tracks, which
were a literal divide between black and white communities, lead her to her
piano teacher who scared Nina; “It was her being white..”, “She was alien to
me.”
Nina started playing disciplined, classical
music, such as Bach, but already, from such a young age, felt completely
isolated from “the white and the Negro” community, and felt as if she was
merely just a source of entertainment for others. In the year 1950, Nina
applied to the Curtis Institute of Music in Philedelphia, but was rejected “I
knew I was good enough, but they turned me down, and it took me about 6 months
to realize it was because I was black.” Nina took up a Philadelphia bar job to
support her family.
As Nina became well known amongst the Jazz
and folk communities, she began to integrate her music with her experiences.
Although popularity was being gained within dominant mainstream society, Nina
was still seen merely as a performer and source of entertainment (often solely
for white audiences). In 1961 she married a police officer, Andy, who became
her manager and landed her performances in well-renowned circles. After playing
in Corgnegie Hall in 1963, Nina Simone was an international success and very
well recognized. Her personal life was complicated though, and far from
shining. She was overworked, had a young baby, her husband was beating her, and
above all, perhaps she wanted her songs to convey meaning, to “help my people”.
Nina’s music became an expression of a
politically resistant minority group. It had the power to span across a diverse
international demographic and affect many individuals, including white
audiences. She had an ability to convey her soul; the pain and
counter-hegemonic struggles she endured and use this to help expose the social
and racial inequalities the black community were faced with. Along with other
poets and writers, Nina addressed the autonomy of the black individual within
such a fragmented social order through radical black activist movements.
Unfortunately for Nina though, consumers
aren’t passive, and rebellion often lies in the production, distribution and
reception of music. Nina couldn’t control the masses, the values and meanings
constructed or taken from her political songs. Although the pattern of shifting
demands is fluid, the issues revolving race were still stuck in a rigid
hegemony; “the industry follows taste rather than forming them.” In reality, an
artist often has to conform to an industry to maintain their success, and Nina
was rebelling against the very institutions that reinforced racial hierarchies.
This raises a question: do the choices
given to us (audiences and artists) by corporations and institutions actually
represent the freedom of choice and cultural expression? Although we do have
choices, there are often restrictions placed upon us, many of which are
invisible.
Nina was pushed out of mainstream American
society as her songs became more and more politically orientated, and her
promoters didn’t book her as much because of her reputation. What was happening
then, was a complex interplay between musicological, sociological and ideological
forces. The meaning created by audiences was divided into two distinct
responses: relatable, leading to emotional attachment, or intimidating, tapping
into insecurities. These divides can lead us back to historical discourses
regarding biological categorization of race which lead to “commonsense” racism
as a way to make sense of others and know who to trust and who not to. Rather
than an instilled, innate fear of “the other,” though, now an essentialist fear
of losing a power battle that is so regimented in the social order, only
contributing to the subordination and domination of racial hierarchies. The
cultural purpose ascribed to meaning addresses issues such as where Nina’s
songs fit in according to helping audiences construct their own sense of self,
and what values, beliefs and views they believe she represented. As Nina
pointed out, all she wanted was to create a sense of “pride in that identity.
Got to make my songs more powerful to bring about that curiosity. Who am I?
Where do I come from?”
The problem is, is that race is fluid, and
the definition of race is constantly shifting. The rejection of Nina’s
political songs and what she stood for, promoted rigid and static hierarchies
within the social order, reinforcing a notion of clearly defining boundaries.
This reinforces the importance of the media in reinforcing and structuring
certain ideologies, hierarchies and perceived ‘truths’ in the social world. I
would argue this created a sense of embarrassment, hopelessness and despair in
Nina as her efforts to create change on a macro-level were not visibly met. Her
political acts were seen as the problem, and she was labeled as mentally unfit,
which reinforces white essentialist discourses. The real world effects of these
discourses and ideologies are ongoing, and in Nina’s time, were especially
dangerous and horrific.
Nina’s transgressive performances not only
helped people from black communities, by giving them the confidence to question
their identity and be proud of their ancestory, but also exposed white
communities to real-life injustices and inequalities black communities faced as
a result of pervasive racist hierarchies and ideologies within the white
western dominant social order. Within her structured, and commercial role, Nina
was able to contribute to a culture of resistance by defying social norms,
challenging racist ideologies and becoming a voice for the minorities who often
didn’t have one.
I’ll leave you with a quote from her
daughter, something to think about: “The question is, how do we fit into the
world that we’re around? Are we allowed to be exactly who we are? Was Nina
Simone allowed to be exactly who she was?”
References:
Researching Rhythm and Blues, Arnold
Shaw
Documentary: “What Happened, Miss
Simone?” Liz Garbus
Thank you for this! I have been a fan of her music for years but I never knew all of these things. I will definitely check out What Happened, Miss Simone. This was a very well written post as well, I particularly found the part on commonsense racism interesting. Looking back on her songs now, it makes sense she was as political aware as she was in her art.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! Thanks for this, I look forward to watching this documentary.
ReplyDelete