Orange is the
New Black
Recently watching
orange is the new black hammered home the relevance of this course for me, in
particular lecture 5, which was focused on Hollywood and its others. The
lecture established the complexity and contradictions of the racial politics of
casting, sterotypes and positive images birthed out of the interacting theories
of media deities Stuart Hall, Chris Barker and Shohat & Stam. Learning that
whirlwind of information seemed really messy at the time but that’s really how
media works, the more I think about what media I’ve read and am reading the
intersection of the concepts we discuss in the course.
The show is
boundary breaking in its casting which comprises of far more women than men,
including many of the notoriously underrepresented, near-mythical demographic
in American film and television: PoC women! Even PoC LGBT women! In this sense, the show really punches well above its
weight. Stuart Hall talks about positive imagery of PoC people in the media,
with some of those factors being related to the expansions of the range and
complexity of racial and ethnic representations and the acknowledgement and
celebration of diversity. Orange is the new black succeeds in provding a range
of identities broader than your average mainstream television show, but is it
for a genuine political statement? Does it appropriate difference into a
spectacle in order to sell itself? Well… The main agenda of the show seems more
primarily concerned with drama and intrigue as opposed to genuine political
statement, but in a male dominated industry I guess any show centred around a
predominantly female cast has got some political weight behind it. The first
season (pretty average) definitely seems to appropriate difference as a selling
point, with the story line revolving around a white main character and her
interactions with the very “different” inmates around her. However the second
season (markedly better viewing) explores a far wider variety of characters and
their plotlines. While it does give a bigger share of screentime to characters belonging
to marginalised groups however, it still draws upon some familiar sterotypes. The
tragic mulatto comes to mind for instance. Or an East Asian woman with a weak
grasp on english and absolutely zero persona, used only as a filler or for the
ocassional punchline. Then again, Shohat and Stam allude to problems with
sterotype analysis. Maybe I should focus on how this diverse female cast is
bucking industry trends. Media 216 has got me thinking!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.