Recently, whilst
chatting to a friend about New Zealand’s demographics, my friend claimed that
in the next few decades Asians would be the dominant cultural group in Auckland
and argued that all the good things about “New Zealand culture” would gradually
disappear.
Of course, these
thoughts are not new. In 2011, a right wing resistance group was investigated
after distributing pamphlets titled ‘Stop the Asian Invasion’ throughout
Auckland and Christchurch. Likewise, in
2014 during his speech on National’s weak defence of their recent selling of
land to foreign-buyers, Winston Peters’ joked that ‘two Wongs don’t make a
right’ — playing on the fear of Asian immigration.
Yet what
intrigued me most was my friend’s definition of “New Zealand culture”. Asking
him to expand on this term he replied, ‘Well, you have to admit that there is a
distinctly New Zealand culture. You know: our love of rugby, no.8 wire, the
ANZACs….’. This list brought to mind a collection of stamps published by New
Zealand Post I had been admiring, entitled “Counting in Kiwi”, that, like my friend,
listed items, activities and events claimed to be characteristic of “New
Zealand culture” such as Jandals, Cricket, Lamingtons, 21st birthday
parties. Notably, both these lists failed to account for the wide variety of
ethnic groups in New Zealand including Maori, Pacific Islanders, and, yes,
people of Asian descent. Of course, this
is directly linked to the idea of “whiteness” or “Pakehaness” as an unnamed and
invisible cultural group thus creating a myth that to be Pakeha is “normal”
while to be anything “other” is not.
In this light it
is not surprising that many Pakeha
fear the consequences of Asian immigration. Because our identities are
primarily formed through recognition of what we are not, the increasing
presence of Asian culture in New Zealand cities challenges the idea of white
hegemony by bringing attention to the Pakeha colonial identity. On the
“Counting in Kiwi” stamp sheet are two stamps in particular which speak volumes
about how Pakeha view their place in New Zealand society — one portrays Captain
James Cook’ 1769 landing in New Zealand and the other of a white statue in
front of the Beehive. Both demonstrate
the way in which the idea of white hegemonic power has become naturalised in
postcolonial New Zealand. As Avril Bell
has rightly pointed out, Pakeha don’t like to be named as a distinctive ethnic
group, preferring to claim that “We’re just New Zealanders” rather than risk
admitting the reality of white privilege.
This is where the fear of immigration stems from. Pakeha do not fear the
loss of an “inherent” New Zealand culture. That has already been largely
achieved through colonialism and attempts to systematically destroy the Maori
identity. Asian immigration challenges
assimilationist and white hegemonic rhetoric and it appears that Pakeha do not
take this threat lightly. The toppling
of white hegemony is a scary thought for those whose privileges rest upon it.
Sounds reasonable but it seems you did not engage much with the 'media'.
ReplyDeleteI interpret the word "media" to mean anything that attempts to communicate an understanding of the world, and in doing so, influence the audience's understanding of "reality". Thus, in my opinion, the collection of stamps is a form of media.
DeleteI agree that the population of Asian will increase severely in Auckland, but unsure if it will be the dominant group, possibly equal to NZ European. Statistics are very outdated. I disagree that "New Zealand culture would gradually disappear" as we are a diverse nation, and NZ culture includes the culture of Maori, NZ European, Asian and non-Maori pacific islander.
ReplyDeleteYou'll note I address both of these points later on in the post.
Delete