There is a New
Zealand myth that racism against Maori has been overcome to the extent that
Maori have more opportunities and rights than non-Maori. Why, people ask, is there no Pakeha
television while Maori Television continues for
the sole purpose of furthering Maori culture? Why are there more opportunities
for Maori students to access support through scholarships and Tuakana-like
programmes? I have even heard others in New Zealand accuse Maori of abusing the
Treaty of Waitangi, claiming that their interpretation of the text is distorted
to gain more control over New Zealand’s land and resources to the detriment of
‘white’ culture. Yet to say that Maori
are more privileged than Pakeha in New Zealand is to be ignorant of racial
power relations in New Zealand and the history in which these power relations
have been produced.
Browne,
Governor of New Zealand during the 1850s, suggested that New Zealand was the
only colony where the Maori people had “been invited to unite with the
Colonists and…become one people”. This
idea continues to be prevalent in New Zealand.
I remember that in the last census there were people who complained that
there was no ‘New Zealander’ option in the ethnicity checklist and argued that
there should be because differences as a result of racial backgrounds had been
overcome. Yet to say that New Zealanders
are all one people refuses to acknowledge that there even is a Maori culture
that is different from Pakeha values. As
such, the argument giving more opportunities to Maori to further their culture
undermines racial equality is ignorant of the fact that the playing field
between Maori and Pakeha was never balanced to begin with. It is not that Maori ‘need more help’ in
achieving but rather that, because of institutionalised racism, Maori are often
under-advantaged compared to Pakeha. For
example, the Minister of Maori Development, Te Ururoa Flavell, noted in 2014
that Maori were “four to five times more likely to be apprehended, prosecuted
and convicted than non-Maori counterparts”.
The media
often reinforce the structural racism that institutionalised racism works
within. For example, Mike Hosking’s
argument that Waitangi should no longer be observed as a national holiday due
to yearly protests refuses to acknowledge the Tiriti as a legitimate and
honourable commitment that should reflect good relations between Maori and
non-Maori nor that, in many respects, there is a good reason for the protests
given some aspects of the Treaty have not been upheld.
It has come to the point that Maori are (in some areas) more privileged than non-maori. In university especially. For example, in law Maori have "reserved spots". Students have to have a B average in other subjects along with B+ to get into second year. Whereas, the average is lower for Maori. So if 200 non-maori get B+ and B average, a few non maori will be held back, and Maori who don't get good grades, for example, C+ Law and B other papers, they will still get through. Maori are also over represented in parliament, which isn't fair for other ethnic groups in NZ, such as Asian, pacific islander etc.
ReplyDelete