Postcolonialism in Science Fiction: Comparing Firefly and Star Trek
Science
fiction is a facet of contemporary media that actively works to reflect and
critique upon society, so it is unsurprising that colonial allegories can be
found within it. Space westerns in particular are prone to such narratives, as
they relocate the frontier to outer space and thus retell stories of forced
settlement, assimilation and constructions of empire. Television series Firefly and it’s filmic companion Serenity, have been compared to Star Trek in their appraisals of
colonisation by Brown, who stipulates that the key is the relationship between
the central characters and the governing body of each diegesis. In Firefly/Serenity (F/S), Captain Malcolm
Reynolds and his crew exist outside of the dominant political regime, whereas
in Star Trek the officers of the
Enterprise are working within the Federation. Brown’s comments can easily be
transposed onto the works of Barry Barclay- she is effectively providing
examples of the camera on the shore (F/S)
and the camera on the boat (Star Trek).
These fourth cinema terms refer to perspectives that identify with the
indigenous and the settler respectively, and as a result F/S offers a more complex, fractured view of the colonial empire.
In Star Trek- space is treating like
terra nullius to be ‘discovered’ whereas Brown suggests F/S constructs a more nomadic space- a postcolonial land wandered
by those marginalised in society- the diaspora.
Other
science fiction such as Avatar and District 9 can also be compared in
relation to colonial narratives- with both progressive and regressive readings
possible. Each text reflects on the dangerous of forced settlement or
re-settlement of indigenous people, and encourage the viewer to identify with
indigenous perspectives through filmic style (documentary style footage and
addressing the camera directly) and formats (3D technologies in cinema). This
is through the vehicle of a (white) protagonist, who eventually joins the
marginalised community, and becomes an honourary ‘native’. Yet the
inevitability of transformation from human to alien/other has drawn critique,
as it seems to suggest the two cultures are mutually exclusive, and hybridity
fundamentally unstable or unattainable (Veracini). Yet the films do not stop at
this dismissal of mixed race heritage- they continue to send clearer messages
of miscegenation- treating interracial relationships as explicit (sex scene cut
from Avatar prior to release) or as scandalous (used in District 9 as explanation for the main characters transformation
into alien). Furthermore, the
protagonists of each film refuse to associate with the alien Others unless they
are of an elite rank (e.g. Neytiri or Christopher Johnston)- reducing the rest
to stereotypical (noble) savages. In addition to this, the film treats their
indigenous (the aliens) as something to be conquered rather than beings of
value- locating the texts as distinctively settler
colonial. Those who inhabit the worlds of Pandora, and refugee camp district 9
are not to be cilivised, or used to progress the colonial reach (for example,
manning alien weaponary, or mining unobtanium), but rather eradicted
(Veracini).
Avatar and District 9 seem to share the colonial nostalgia previously
identified in Star Trek- revealed not
through repeated reconstructions of first contact, but rather in reiterations
of the settler desire to ‘go native’ and become indigenous (Veracini). This is linked
with the exoticism fundamental to Edward Said’s theory of Orientalism, which
proposes ‘Eastern’ cultures are romanticised, mythologised and eroticised by
the western gaze. Such viewpoints give rise to western fantasies of obtaining
the beauty, mystery and connection to nature seemingly held naturally by
members of the East- in essence: outperforming the other at their own tasks.
Examples in Avatar and District 9 involve the capture and
control of mythic beast Toruk, and the successful raid of the MNU,
respectively. Firefly and Serenity discuss the impact of
colonialism in the least problematic way out of the texts examined thus far-
precisely because they locate their narration outside of the dominant discourse.
Sources:
Barclay,
Barry. "Celebrating fourth cinema." Illusions 35 (2003): 7-11.
Brown, Rebecca M. "Orientalism in Firefly and
Serenity." Slayage: The Online
International Journal of Buffy Studies 7.1 (2008).
Firefly: The Complete Series. Joss Whedon. Twentieth
Century Fox Home Entertainment, Inc., 2014. DVD.
Renan,
Ernst. "1990. What is a nation." Nation
and Narration. London: Routledge (1882): 8-22.
Said,
Edward. Orientalism. New York:
Vintage (1978).
Serenity. Dir. Joss Whedon. By Joss
Whedon. Prod. Barry Mendel. Universal
This was an incredibly stimulating read! The interpretation of the mythicism of science fiction as standing in for real-world Orientalism and that juxtaposition with the (often) post-apocalyptic worlds it constructs is quite interesting.
ReplyDeleteI've always found the way in which films depict aliens interesting, particularly in terms of the parallels they have with contemporary anxieties. Take Steven Spielberg's "War of the Worlds" for instance. Not only are the aliens come to destroy the world represented as "abnormal", menacing and downright evil creatures, but they turn-up again in cinema just four years after the 2001 terrorist attacks on the twin towers in America thus reflecting fears of the Oriental "other".
ReplyDelete