In the lecture on
postcolonialism, reference was made to the removal of the Cecil Rhodes statue
from the University of Cape Town’s campus following passionate student protests
against its presence in 2015. It is not
hard to see why. Rhodes was a white and
wealthy British imperialist in South Africa who suggested that Anglo-Saxons
were ‘the first
race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is
for the human race’ while his drafting of policies such as the Native Lands Act
are said to have paved the way towards policies of apartheid in South Africa
during the mid to late twentieth century. Since Rhodes could be said to be the
personification of colonialism many anti-imperialists, such as Adekeye Adebao,
have argued over the course of the #rhodesmustfall debate that to retain the
statue of Rhodes – a symbol of oppression for many marginalised groups –
celebrates white superiority, alienates marginalised groups, and reflects and reinforces
a strongly Eurocentric world view (Parkinson).
Rhodes' Fall, University of Cape Town, 2015. |
Of course, these statues are by
no means restricted to South Africa. One
only has to search around central Auckland to find a myriad of historic monuments
celebrating colonialism: The Symonds Street Memorial to British and Maori
Imperial troops who died during the New Zealand Wars (but no mention of those
Maori who lost their lives in defence of what they considered to be their
land), the historic wall of the Albert Barracks, and of course the intimidating
statues in Albert Park of Governor George Grey (largely responsible, among
other actions, for the forced confiscation of Maori land in the Waikato), and Queen Victoria.
Yet even though these memorials
celebrate events that attempted to destroy many Indigenous cultures, I am not
convinced that these symbols should be removed. For me, the statues stand as
opportunities to discuss postcolonialism. There is a well-rooted myth in New
Zealand that the relationship between Maori and Pakeha is healthy and that colonialism has been overcome. Likewise, knowledge of the history of the New
Zealand Wars, continuing Maori land grievances, and the Treaty of Waitangi has
been largely neglected from New Zealand education systems. This social amnesia
suggests that there is a tendency for people to avoid contentious topics that
may threaten the above myth of a healthy nation – perhaps even threatening the
nation’s cohesion.
Statue of Queen Victoria, Albert Park |
Yet when I walk through Albert Park each day on my way to
University, buried in my personal thoughts, I am forced to confront these
dedications to colonialism. These statues remind me daily of the violence and
suffering that this land went through at the hand of colonisation and their
very presence reminds me that the racism and grief caused by colonialism in New
Zealand has not been overcome. I agree that these statues are celebrating
people and events which, in retrospect, ought not to be celebrated and so
reinforce aspects of colonial discourse in today’s society. In this light more effort could be made to
inform the public of the negative effects these events have had on the country
- perhaps by adding to the memorials plaques that critique the history these
statues have written or moving the statues towards a location, such as a museum,
which prevents their regressive effects on race relations while also educating
the country on its problematic past. I just feel that the action of removing
all symbols of colonialism suggests that colonialism has been overcome and that
that is the end of the discussion. Removing references to our colonial history
would only serve to reinforce social amnesia - the ignorance towards our
turbulent past and the ignorance towards issues in our turbulent present resulting
from that past. The passion instilled
within the students of the University of Cape Town by the statue of Cecil
Rhodes was righteous and proves that these statues serve as valuable
opportunities to critique and undermine past and present atrocities,
mythologies and Eurocentric worldviews.
Works Cited
Justin Parkinson. ’Why is Cecil
Rhodes such a controversial figure?’. 1 April 2015. Web. Accessed 13 May 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32131829.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.